In Defence of Dr. Daniel Nagase
My evidence and rant to the parties involved in taking him down.
Over the last 3+ years, my life has taken more spins and turns than the craziest rollercoaster.
Just a little over 6 months ago, I had the privilege in meeting Dr. Daniel Nagase at a rally we we both speaking at. What started as an innocent intro has developed into a pretty incredible friendship. Not only were we both able to obtain both a pfizer covid-19 vial but 2 moderna syringes which he took to a lab for independent analysis. The results? Well, let’s just say that they are consistent with what we’ve seen on the net and I still have to sit down with him and go over all of the images for clarification for an over-due substack piece which has been waiting patiently.
In any event, the cool thing about speaking with a doctor who doesn’t have his head buried in the sand is the fact that no topics are off-limits and there is plenty of incredible dialogue. In fact, I don’t think that we have not seen eye-to-eye on any subject material.
Our calls last for hours and good thing neither of us are charging one another ;)
A few weeks ago I got a call from him regarding an email he received from Dr. Trevor Corneil who was assigned by the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons to review his speeches and anything else he spoke out about since the “Great Social Experiment of 2020” reared it’s toxic bioweapon-infested head. Aside from the first few pages of alleged credentials, the majority of his 71 page report was laughable at best and littered with very questionable statements.
On the first pass, I couldn’t get past the 1st 5 or 6 pages as I was in shock how biased and uninformed Dr. Corneil really was when it came to Ivermectin or anything else he wasted 4 months on .. Yes 4 months.
Dr. Nagase was given 3 weeks to form a rebuttal.
Can anyone say “Kangaroo Court is now in session”?
Fortunately, my new friend accepted the challenge and also invited me to participate in this fiasco..
My email will be used as evidence for part of his defence.. However, I was given less then 24 hours to complete it with a laptop which goes on auto-scroll mode “up” or “down” it doesn’t discriminate against me but is s serious pain in the ass, especially when I have to add or edit something.. :(
In any event here’s my email..
To trevor.corneil@ubc.ca RachelNoble@ngariss.org gkeirstead@CPSBC.CA lisa@ngariss.org andrea@ngariss.org dhammell@CPSBC.CA RIrvine@CPSBC.C Ajenkinsonv@gmail.com KBracken@CPSBC.CA
Monday, February 13th, 2023 at 5:35 PMMonday, February 13th, 2023 at 5:35 PM
SUBJECT - These materials are for presentation for the defense of Dr. Daniel Nagase
Trevor et al,
Unlike you getting 4months to prepare a 71 page doc, Dr. Nagase got 3 weeks for his rebuttal and I have under 24 hours. Oh how I l love the 2023 version of preparing for a Kangaroo Court. Yes, I'm going there.
At any rate, I am an independent researcher with well over 35 years of experience covering a variety of subject matter. I was born during the Hong Kong Flu and was "vaccine injured" as a child. After my 2D's and 2P's, I developed asthma, severe anaphylaxis, hypertension and ADHD even though I skipped 2-1/2 grades in 3 months. The school system couldn't keep up with me so I was the 1st child in NS to be put on Ritalin in the mid 70's. What I didn't know was they cut the ritalin with cocaine. Officially I was a lab rat and spent 3-4 days a week in a Dr's office or hospital until I was 18.
Aside from being the "Murphy's Law Poster Boy for Accidents" from 1991 - 1993, 1995, 2002 (L5 disc) and a mini stroke in 2009, I've been relatively healthy as I eat as healthy as possible due to the overwhelming amount of side effects from meds I was on during my "pain years'..
My last hospital visit happened in 2015 when I ate something which put me in emerg with welts all over my body and given the fact that anaphylaxis is listed on both the Oct 22,2020 and Feb 2021 VRBPAC list of "Working List of Possible Adverse Event Outcomes" when these "vaccines" were given "Interim Order Approval" I paid close attention.
Since then? The only time I have been sick was when I wasn't getting enough sleep and my immune system took me out for a total of 6 days (2 days/year) over the last 3 years. Based on my medical history, I should've been a prime target for what ever this "thing" is, which after 211 FOIA requests for proof of isolation/purification still has "no records found"..
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Pay close attention to the amount of Canadian groups their are and which ones. Aside from the RCMP, there are 51 other entities which should have conclusive proof..
Oh, don't forget the "Drosten Paper" but did you read the rebuttal? https://www.covid19reader.com/did-faulty-science-lead-to-lockdowns-examining-the-drosten-paper/
Now I don't want to play the germ vs terrain theory game as this is neither the time, nor place for it.
Since March 2020, I have devoted well over 13,000 hours of independent research when deemed "non-essential". To date, I deal with well over 250,000 medical and scientific experts in 48 countries for which I am eternally grateful for. Many of these wonderful humans are either whistleblowers or want to come forward but are continuously being silenced, coerced or threatened if they go against the narrative? Why? Is this what the "scientific method" is supposed to stand for? Open debate? Challenges? Replication of evidence? Odd how everyone of them have dealt with patients during the last 3+ years vs those who hide behind policy or bureaucracy or "modelling" data.
Dr. Daniel Nagase is one of the above medical and scientific experts not on the government payroll who has enriched not only my life and countless others. I had the pleasure of sharing the same stage at a rally we both spoke at earlier in 2022 and unlike those who you and others brand as right-wing, tin-foil hat, anti-science, god-loving, trumpers, I don't play politics nor religion. I do not base my speeches on "freedom". Instead, my speeches are littered with facts, evidence, data and stats which is entirely source-based upon request or compiled in my substack.
If you have a question or need clarification on a medically-related matter? He has yet to let me down. He is very detailed, well researched and actually answers questions in a timely manner. His expertise is top notch. Dr. Nagase has opened my eyes to an experimental med which was used in the hospital he worked at during this alleged pandemic (sorry, but when you have an IFR lower than the seasonal flu). You know this, I know this and many others also know this. Our phone calls last 2-4 hours and every call is very educational and fascinating.
Now he has to defend himself, it's bad enough that you, ok not literally, took his family away from him because he opted to draw a line in the sand but this current fiasco is where I draw the line.
IF this "great social experiment of 2020" was as lethal as 1st advertised, the entire planet would've been locked down, all stores would be closed, people would be locked in their houses with their windows sealed shut and the only way that you could get food would be from the military which would deliver your food to your front door which had a decontamination chamber affixed to it..
Problem is? We never came close to that. The population was duped by a faulty model from Neil Ferguson and the folks at Imperial College of London..
Did you notice how the deaths increased in the same period of time post rollout? Don't even get me started on all-cause mortality as I find it odd how instead of being beaten down with daily updates for over a year, the gov't opted to move to a weekly reporting scheme, all the while still pushing fear.. Cortisol levels LOVE fear (sarcasm intended).
If I want to get really picky, the numbers pre-jab are also questionable if you add in the fact that the PCR had a 97.1% false positive rate due to the over-cycling (40-45 in Canada) and the other fact that PCR was not a "Covid-only" test.
That's a slight problem if you want to convince people that there is a killer pandemic happening. What about EMR/EMF, WIFI, cell phone, environmental exposures, constant exposure from 80 years of Nuclear testing, poor diets, etc.?
How is it that not 1 alleged health "expert" in the western hemisphere ever spoke -about looking after our immune systems by-eating health organic foods, drinking properly filtered water (sorry tap water doesn't cut it and that's with over a decade in the industry),taking properly sourced vitamins and minerals, and exercise
Shall I repeat it again? If so, re-read it again and look at their model I included within my substack piece above.
It's bad enough that the only approved "treatment" happened to have a 53.1% kill rate in the Ebola Trials and an 88.6 kill rate once exposed to the people.
https://rupreparing.com/news/2022/1/6/remdesivir-a-world-divided-amp-serious-questions
Then we have another issue, the CICP database in which 98 of the 100 people reported using this toxic drug DIED. Take your pick on which report you want to review and do a word search for "Remdesivir" . The numbers don't lie. https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data#table-1
Another issue lies with ventilator abuse and the cash cow it turned into. I'm baffled at the fact that people who still had open airways were put on vents. Also baffled from the fact that a majority of nurses and other health care professionals didn't have the proper training for vents. I have 1st hand evidence from nurses in the US who had to turn down the "volume" on the vents when the started their shifts in many hospitals which patients were coding. We even have the study for further proof.
Then there is another drug which Dr. Nagase mentioned which was used in his hospital in AB - baricitinib..
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/baricitinib-side-effects.html
Meanwhile, other off-label or repurposed drugs were ignored or scorned by the alleged "experts'.. Have you actually read any trials which weren't skewed?
"COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 2,495 studies - Analysis of 48 COVID early treatments, approvals in 80 countries, database of 2,287 treatments" https://c19early.org/
Aside from the fact that 2 of the drugs were low cost, with one coming off patent, the other given an EUA in the US from March 28-June 15 https://www.fda.gov/media/136537/download
Don't forget the study which The Lancet was forced to retract regarding HCQ - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2820%2931180-6/fulltext
There's another reason why HCQ was pulled. The alleged "Vaccine" aka "Experimental Gene Therapy Bioweapon" clinical trials started and if these drugs and other therapies were allowed to continue, there would be NO NEED OF ANY CLINICAL TRIALS.
However, aside from the Nobel Prize winning "Horsepaste" getting its fair share of smear campaigns, HCQ was used for SARS-1 with incredible success and stockpiled for years.. Is there evidence to support this? You decide.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/
THE COVID-19 "Vaccine" Clinical Trials.
This is what I've learned about Coronaviruses over the years, assuming they are properly isolated or purified. They have 2 inherent problems which is why funding has always been a problem.
1. they resolve themselves over time. Where did SARS-1, MERS, Avian, Swine, etc all go?
2. variants, may be more transmissible but are NEVER as lethal as the ancestral strain.
Odd how we never saw a "vaccine" for any of the coronaviruses listed in #1 above. Why not? SARS-1 had a higher IFR than SARS Cov-2 but the world was not put on a 2+ year pause.
Years ago, I was taught that "vaccines" are:
supposed to induce an immune response
block transmission
prevent infection
have a weakened live viral fragment from patient 0 or 1 (depending on which country you live in)..
Yet, none of the Interim Order approved "vaccines" do any of the above.
After the rollout, I started calling I have called PHAC, Health Canada, OCC, REB, NRCan, CIHR, Health BC, BCCDC, Fraser/Coast/Island/Interior Health in which I have asked all of them for the trial data for Canadians involved in the original trials for the ancestral C19 strain. Not one of the aforementioned agencies could provide me any source links or data. I have recorded about 300 hours of my calls.
Since you are an expert with a couple of decades of experience under your belt, short of slapping you with a FOIA request, kindly provide me any data for Canadians involved in any of the original trials. I reviewed the clinical trials for Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and AZ with AZ still not approved under EUA in the US and Canada is no where to be found.. Well, unless you want to bring up the LNP issue aka LNP Providence (Artbutus, Aquitas & UBC)... Hello violation of the 1985 Competition Act.
The fact that Canada never participated in ANY of the ancestral trials is concerning and is potentially violates Health Canada's phrase that "vaccines" take at least 10 years" before they get approved".
Here's the link for Immunize BC and it's littered with issues when it comes to vaccine testing and approval. I've added the last paragraph as this was never the case for the C19 shots.
"No safety steps are skipped in these cases, and the vaccine still has to meet all the same safety requirements. An example is COVID-19 vaccines. " https://immunizebc.ca/ask-us/questions/how-long-does-it-take-vaccine-be-tested-and-approved-use-canada
Moreover, how can ANY alleged "Health Official" actually have the gall to stand behind any decision passed down from our Chief Health Officer, or an alleged group of experts who have potential conflicts of interest if 0 Canadians were part of the original trials for the ancestral strain which would be rendered useless once the alleged Delta strain appeared in Aug 2020?
How many of the manufactures adjusted their formulations during the clinical trials once the new variants appeared out of nowhere? The answer? 0
With that said, how could you support? authorize? promote? a gene therapy product which has a history or wiping out the animals in their trials once they are expose to a wild-type virus? Did you even have a chance to review any of the Manufacturing Agreements (1) (2)? Ignorance of the facts are no longer an excuse.
How can you, in good conscience allow a product to be administered into the arms of people which was promoted as an "intramuscular" injection when we are finding evidence of the spike throughout the blood and organs?
Back in late Dec 2021, a friend sent me a link to 1,000 studies pertaining to AESI's or S/SAE's (severe/serious adverse events) including death. To be frank? I was a mess, I found 400 links which were either dead links or blank abstracts which isn't good enough. So I took it upon myself to fix it, put them in alphabetical and chronological order which is one of the largest on planet earth not affiliated with any medical/scientific journal. However, the source links are from the Lancet, BMJ, NEJM, MCPI, NIH, JAMA, Springer, etc..
I stopped at approx 1,600 as it was taking a toll on me and have added a few more from time to time.
Shortly, thereafter, I decided to look at the chemical ingredients compared to their respective MSDS sheets and found that 70% of the Lipids, Buffers and Salts contained the terms "Not for HUMAN or ANIMAL Use, for lab or chemical use only".. It gets worse when you look at the lack of data for reproductive, carcinogenicity, etc..
Yet, this little important fact missed the entire scientific community. I'm currently doing the same for the alleged "boosters" which, when you can find the MSDS sheets which were not corrupted post rollout they also have the same 70% problem affixed to it. Yet there is another issue with the "Boosters". Aside from changing the formulation, last time I checked, if you change the ingredients of a thing and call it a booster, can it legally or scientifically be called as such? It seems the mice (yeah, finally trial on animals) didn't agree.. https://owenowenowen.substack.com/p/if-the-boosters-never-worked-on-mice
You are probably asking yourself, "why is this person calling these "safe & effective vaccines" bioweapons? Glad you asked, it's because they are. I took a deep dive into the patents, SEC filings, various medical journals/papers and even the media to find this out..
Aside from Dr. David Martin (1) (2) and Dr. Richard Fleming extensive research into this topic, this was sent to me a couple of days ago and should make you think twice next time you want to see these bioweapons injected into innocent human beings.. Katherine Watt who has done some incredible research into the bioweapons and other relevant issues pertaining to present day. (1) , (2) , (3)
She also does an excellent piece on the Ventavia (Pfizer) whistleblower, Brook Jackson in which the BMJ published.
I have too many studies, links, etc to share on the above Bioweapon topic but now I want to address the missing portions of the clinical trials when it comes to short, mid and long-term safety studies.
Remember that group of Canadian Agencies I mentioned way above? Well, I also reached out to them for the following info with regards to any safety data..
1. biodiversity
2. genotoxicity
3. carcinogenicity
4. pregnancy, reproductive, menstrual - back in late 2020, Pfizer signed an LOI to perform tests on pregnant and new moms. This never happened before they started injecting innocent moms and moms to be. I know a couple of unjabbed actors who are on set and whenever they are around jabbed actors they are getting their periods 2x-3x's/month
5. multiple comorbidities - excluded from the trials
6. children (all ages) - the worst being the 6months - 4/5yr olds where 2/3's of the participants never got past the 1st or 2nd shot. Remember, there are 20,000,000 children in this age category and they bum rushed the EUA based on sketchy data from 7 kids.
7. lipid nanoparticle distribution (LNP)
8. pharmacokinetic (PK)
9. pharmacodynamic
10. mix and match studies.
11. Shedding/transmission
12. Prior alleged "Covid19" infection.
13. Human studies for the "Booster"
Here's the link for Pfizer's "landmark study"
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
So, if Pfizer never tested for any of the above or excluded certain "groups" for their trials, how can you or anyone else in your position stand by these products?
What about modeRNA?
Phase 1 study.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283461
Phase 2
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
Phase 3
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427?term=mRNA-1273&recrs=e&draw=2&rank=2
The "exclusionary criteria" in all 3 phases of modeRNA's trials are a masterpiece (sarcasm also noted)
Moreover, why were the animals trials skipped before these bioweapons were released to the masses? Are you actually ok with skipping these trials for an ongoing experiment on humans? I'm not, nor is any other medical profession who truly values their hippocratic oath.
A little bit on the "Booster" and mice
From Dec 20, 2022.
"Extended SARS-CoV-2 RBD booster vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune tolerance in mice"
"The repetitive applications of vaccine boosters have been brought up in face of continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with neutralization escape mutations, but their protective efficacy and potential adverse effects remain largely unknown."
NOTE. of course their efficacy and potential AE's are largely unknown if you don't study them in the trials or study them ,find out that there are safety signals, etc.. Remember, THERE WERE NO HUMANS INVOLVED IN THE BOOSTER CLINICAL TRIALS!.. Yet there are those who took the 1st round of shots continue to take them.
Why?
What are the benefits?
-You won't get sick? Nope. You still will.
- You won't get hospitalized? Nope. Still happens
- You won't wind up in the ICU? Nope.. You will with the potential of other issues triggered from the product you allowed to be injected into your deltoid muscle which was goes throughout your blood stream and organs and penetrates your blood barrier
- You won't die? Well, we all eventually die but this also exacerbates your chances of death..
These products are hurting your immune system and your body, in general and studies go back as early as April 2021
"Highlights
• IL-10 overproduction compromises NSC survival, leading to hippocampal neurogenesis reduction in adulthood.
• IL-10 overproduction results in spatial learning and memory impairment.
• IL-10 overproduction increases microglial CD200R expression and reduces microglial CX3CR1 expression in the hippocampus.
• Effects by IL-10 overproduction resemble those produced by physiological aging.
5. Conclusions
This work shows the importance of the microenvironment on microglial cells and their relationship with neurogenesis. Interestingly, we have demonstrated that chronic anti-inflammatory IL-10 overproduction has a similar effect to physiological aging on the hippocampus. Specifically, in transgenic animals and WT with normal aging, hippocampal neurogenesis and memory are impaired together with alterations in the microglia-neuron communication. Likely, IL-10 overexpression modifies microglial receptors involved in neuronal communication, resulting in reduced neurogenesis. This study emphasizes the variety of possibilities that a specific cytokine can exert depending on the moment and the time in which it is expressed. Thus, we describe new properties of IL-10 in hippocampal neurogenesis in vivo."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159121006577
Back to the Dec study..
"Multiple vaccine boosters after the conventional vaccination course significantly decreased RBD-specific antibody titers and serum neutralizing efficacy against the Delta and Omicron variants, and profoundly impaired CD4+ and CD8+T cell activation and increased PD-1 and LAG-3 expressions in these T cells. Mechanistically, we confirmed that extended vaccination with RBD boosters overturned the protective immune memories by promoting adaptive immune tolerance. Our findings demonstrate potential risks with the continuous use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, providing immediate implications for the global COVID-19 vaccination enhancement strategies."
- Boosters vs Primary series and not real "vaccines". Moreover, RBD's (receptor binding domains) are a key part of a virus located on its ‘spike’ domain that allows it to dock to body receptors to gain entry into cells and lead to infection. These are also the primary targets in the prevention and treatment of viral infections. These RBD's are turning on the body and attacking your immune system. The fact that the body initially accepts the synthetic self-assembling spike protein then turns on the spike once it realizes that it's an imposter is too late. The damage has been done and will continue to do as such to the point that you WILL wind in the hospital, ICU and potentially die quicker. :(
CD4 and CD8 are important for immunity protection and they are now impaired after the shots.. Don't forget. These shots don't promote/provide mucosal immunity which is paramount for fighting upper respiratory viruses, well the ones that they have proof of isolation/purification, of which SARS CoV-2 did either..
These shots are hurting your immune system and removing your antibodies. FACT. Therefore the manufactures and their paid govt and health shills are lying through their teeth..
The study authors are also hinting that the jabs are a risk and should be stopped based on my interpretation.
"Since late 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has overtaken the global dominance and epidemiology studies have identified substantial levels of vaccine breakthrough infections and reinfections"
- These alleged 1st series of "vaccines" were allegedly developed for the alleged ancestral strain and NOT THE VARIANTS (delta, omnicron, etc).
"Accumulating evidence showed that the use of the first vaccine booster dose was safe and effective, and it could produce high titers of neutralizing antibodies with improved efficacy against Omicron variants "
- Sure it was. If anything more people got sick, hospitalized, wound up in the ICU or died as a direct result of the rollout which I pointed out in one of my latest substack pieces - https://owenowenowen.substack.com/p/the-numbers-from-canada-and-the-rest
"However, the serum protection after one booster vaccination was shown to decline with time, which again rendered the immunized individuals prone to continuous risk from newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 variants. Thus, the administration of a second booster vaccine or, possibly, routine vaccination with boosters was brought to light, for which scarce information was available. More information was needed to properly address relevant questions in the practical field of COVID-19 prophylaxis, such as the recommended condition for the use of additional booster vaccines, the suggested number of enhancement shots to be given and the potential adverse effects of continues administration of booster vaccines."
- Imagine my surprise? It never had any protection to begin with. Yet another fact.
"One of the major concerns associated with continuous immunization with booster vaccines is the relative limited response window of systematic immunity to the same stimuli. It has been reported that foreign antigen stimulation can induce immune tolerance, which is manifested as inability or low efficiency to produce antigen-specific antibodies and to activate effector T cells"
- Remember my point above when I mentioned that the fake spike tricks the body then attacks it? I hate being right.. ;)
"Presently, it is unclear whether extended administration of RBD vaccine boosters can re-establish protective immunity or is prone to induce immune tolerance."
- I beg to differ
"We found that the conventional immunization course could stimulate sustained levels of neutralizing antibodies and promote the antigen specific CD4+ and CD8+T cell reactivity. However, continued vaccination promoted the formation of a prominent adaptive immune tolerance and profoundly impaired the established immune response with the conventional course, evidenced by significant reductions in antigen specific antibody and T cell response, a loss of immune memory and form of immunosuppression micro-environment. Our findings demonstrated the potential risks associated with an extended vaccine booster course of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with immediate implications for the strategic use of homology booster vaccines."
- The 1st part of this is debatable but the rest is "statistically significant" enough to warrant a full stop.
"Results
“Extended immunization did not enhance RBD specific antibody production in mice
Extended immunization reduced serum neutralizing antibody responses"
Extended immunization inhibited the production of RBD-specific memory B cells"
Extended immunization suppressed the formation of the germinal center"
Extended immunization inhibited the activation of CD4+T cell immune responses"
Extended immunization inhibited CD8+ T cell-mediated immune response"
- So if it doesn't work in mice, how can it work in humans?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017515
Then we have a serious issue with IgG4 levels increasing instead of IgG3 after the shot - https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwreck-of-all-trainwrecks-billions-of-people-stuck-with-a-broken-immune-response/
Why are you ignoring "Net Harm"
""To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31,207–42,836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. " https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449.full.pdf
5-11
"Independent report
Appendix 1: estimation of number needed to vaccinate to prevent a COVID-19 hospitalisation for primary vaccination, booster vaccination (3rd dose), autumn 2022 and spring 2023 booster for those newly in a risk group"
Updated 27 January 2023
PAY ATTENTION TO ALL OF THE TABLES
Pfizer leaks/Court Ordered PMA data
Last year, Pfizer lost it's court battle with ICAN for the purpose of withholding their PMA data from the public for 75 years. Thankfully, the US Supreme Court Judge was not on Pfizers payroll. The FDA took 118 days to review a few hundred thousand pages of data which is now available to the public. I suggest you spend some time reviewing it please.
Pay close attention to Page 7 where you see the amount of AESI's in the "Case Outcomes". Of the 42,086 people enrolled in the trials, a staggering 1,223 people died. What's additionally troubling is the line about "not recovered at the time of report" - 11,361 and the lack of data/follow up/etc from the unknown section - 9,400
Pages 16-24 mention the AESI's they were looking into but with minimal follow up. Why? Wouldn't this be concerning enough?
Pages 30-38 - "APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST" of which there are 1,291 different AESI's. My "motherload of rare adverse events.." substack only lists a fraction of these but people are having at least 1 of the 1,291 listed and more.
https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/REDACTED-5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
The entire Pfizer data dump can be found here no thanks to NACI, PHAC or Health Canada.
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Then we have this little gem
"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults" from Science Direct.
Interesting quote from the study
"Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated.."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283
So much for 1 in a million.. Based on this data? We are looking at 1 in 800. Can you now admit that this is actually "statistically significant" and should warrant a full stop on this experiment before it's too late?
Back in 2010/2011 the CDC gave Harvard-Pilgram $1,000,000 to review their VAERS system. What they found will make your head spin.
"Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health."
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
The "1-13%" is criminal. Remember, up until about 6-8 months ago, CDC Wonder (VAERS System) only had 50 employees. By August of 2021, they were already 6 months behind and factoring in the numbers from VAERS or Open VAERS those numbers are still off..
Here's the info on OPEN VAERS - https://openvaers.com/covid-data
"Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VMR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VMRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
There are concerns not only with the under-reporting but the fact that an experimental gene therapy bioweapon NEVER tested on the masses before, was allowed to continue considering the fact that there are at least 10 occasions since the 1955 Cutter Incident where jabs were pulled off market due to deaths (under 50) or AESI's (Bells Palsy, paralysis, cancer, MS, GBS, etc.)
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history.html
Fast forward to Dec 2020/Jan 2021-ish with the FOIA emails from Bonnie Henry. I'm dumbfounded that she allowed these shots to continue and yes their was immense pressure and control from NACI. Bonnie Henry is responsible to the people of BC and I couldn't give a rat's ass about NACI after uncovering their funding conflicts or other conflicts of interest they tried. Note, I'm still working on this one for my substack along with another 14 articles. http://docs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/Response_Package_HTH-2021-13807.pdf
Is any of the above getting through to any of you? Do you not understand that your lack of attention to detail is causing more harm than good? Do you also understand that by promoting these bioweapons that you are in direct violation of at least 10 articles of the 1975 Bioweapons Convention?
You should re-acquaint yourselves with the Declaration of Helsinki please https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
While you are at it, don't forget the 1967 ICCPR -https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
And our Provincial Informed Consent Laws as every single doctor or other person injecting these products into peoples arms without proper informed consent is in direct violation of our PICL. How can anyone give informed consent when the insert sheets are left intentionally blank? How can any patient receive the dangers of the ingredients, potential side effects or the 1,300+ AESI's? Based on this informed consent would last hours to days.. But it is not. Why not? Because Health Canada, NACI or Health Canada said it was "safe and effective"? Or because it alleged prevents infection or blocks transmission? Nope. They never even tested for this in the clinical trials that Canada was NEVER a part of.
There's another elephant in the room. Reporting AESI's or deaths from the jab.. Based on the data, a majority of the AESI's or deaths happened within the first 72 hours but people weren't considered "vaccinated" or "fully vaccinated" until 14 days. Great way to pad your covid-19 stats by the way. (sarcasm intended).
More insult? According to the FDA's fact sheet, the mRNA shots comprised of 2 doses with 1 shot for the viral vector shots. Then it changed, even though there is 0 data to support this. Boosters? Come on. In the 54 years on this planet, I've witnessed lots of insanity when it came from the mouths of gov't officials and even health authorities but to take multiple shots for an alleged "killer" virus which resolves themselves over time before the "get out of hospital free card then call a covid-19 vaccine" is beyond absurd. If you can't understand this, I suggest you all resign immediately.
Here's how I see it and before you start labelling myself or others as "anti-vaxxers" or "science deniers".. Stop.. We are neither. In fact, we are "anti-unsafe medical procedures of any kind" and very "pro-science", well, when it's not politicized which is what's been going on for the last 3+ years. Actually, governments and their complicit/captured Health Authorities are Pro-$cience.
You had 0 evidence to support population-wide masking.
You had 0 evidence to support people standing on a magic circle in a store.
You had 0 evidence to support locking us down..
You had 0 evidence to support the mass inoculation of this province
Yet, there is an abundance of evidence to prove harm for all of the statements I just made.
Still waiting for the "Risk Benefit Analysis" that should've been provided in 2020.. Or an RBA for the jabs.. Nope.. Just sketchy $cience on your websites promoting FRAUD..
If you are offended by anything in which I have shared? Leave your egos at the door please as enough is enough. Unlike you, I've had to report over 100+ deaths and 1000+AESI's to Pfizer US as it's next to impossible to report them in Canada, let alone BC. Sure there is a number you can call but the follow-up is dreadful.
Here's a sad, but related story for you. Aug 2020, my partners Aunt suffered a stroke. As a parting gift, she was also diagnosed with Diabetes and Renal Failure (both of which were not aggressively studied during the original clinical trials). She was recovering somewhat but made the stupid decision (based on her own fears and her Dr's advice) to get a Pfizer shot on April 1, 2021..
On April 15th, she suffered a blood clot in her left leg and the next day, said leg was amputated. She passed 2 months later as the spike was eating her from the inside..
Aside from the issues the Lipids, Buffers and Salts, the Spike is a major problem. It is not naturally re-occurring but a synthetic self-assembling spike protein in which the body can't recognize when it's injected in the deltoid where it doesn't stay.
Sadly, these "spikes' or the shots are producing an Inflammo-Thrombotic response from both the mRNA and the viral vector shots. Research goes back to the mid 1990's on this and is still relevant today - https://www.flemingmethod.com/_files/ugd/659775_e6a31598cb7f4ffd993f02a7d710d8e9.pdf
There's yet another problem with this shots - psedouridine which is present in the shots..
"Pseudouridine (Ψ) is the most abundant post-transcriptional RNA modification and is widespread in multiple RNA species. Ψ impacts various aspects of RNA biology, conferring distinct structural and functional properties to the RNA molecules that it decorates. However, aberrant pseudouridylation contributes to a variety of human diseases, including cancer and genetic disorders. Dysregulation of the Ψ epitranscriptome can arise from mutations and abnormal expression of pseudouridylation machinery, impacting protein translation and other cellular processes. With advancing understanding of Ψ roles in health and disease, efforts are now invested in developing therapeutic and diagnostic approaches targeting Ψ. Emerging reports indicate that Ψ and its installation machinery could be potential pharmacological targets for therapeutic development and may serve as biomarkers for human diseases."
https://www.cell.com/trends/pharmacological-sciences/fulltext/S0165-6147(22)00058-X
As I mentioned earlier, I have devoted 13,000+ hours to this "Great Social Experiment of 2020" and 3,000+ hours have been spent on Covid-19 "Vaccines" vs. how many hours med students spend studying "vaccines" in medical school.
You and the rest who are pushing a narrative littered with harm will have your day but first you have to deal with the 3rd wave of jab injuries as 2021 was the year of heart-related issues, 2022 was heart and increased cancer (I had a friend who went from Stage 1 cancer to Stage 4 in 8 DAYS!).. the next fastest was 2 weeks to a couple of months and all of them had at least 1-3 shots.. 2023 we will see ADE rearing its ugly head in which I predicted in mid 2020 during the trials. I hope I'm wrong but to date, I have yet to make a retraction on ANYTHING i have posted or published.
In closing, I think this whole fiasco with Dr. Nagase is not only a waste of time but it's not based on anything relevant or remotely scientific.. This is a witch hunt. Last I checked this was 2023 and we are more open to debate. Perhaps I am wrong in making this assessment but I do have hope.
To be honest, life was pretty wonderful before I was deemed non-essential but when you took my life away, instead of becoming violent which solves nothing, you lit a fire under my ass to do everything in my power to prove you all wrong. That's on all of you..
If you require sources to any of the above statements I mentioned, please ask but I'm confident that what I provided will suffice.
With confidence,
Owen
PS. You should've hired me 3 years ago as I could've save the province a ton of money and embarrassment. I bill out at $850/hour.
PSS. My computer keyboard has a "scrolling" issue due to the fact that I've made close to 4 million keystrokes since March 2020 so if you see a dead link or something that is misspelled or out of place? That's the reason.
PSSS. Please confirm that you have received this email.